Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:47 pm
by Hryllantre
General question relating to changing tribes...

I wanted to change from tribe 17 to 07 so I inputted [1707](07 eg) should I of only written which tribe I wanted to be ie [0007] for example?...

As the engine rejected my order or [1707]. Of course this was only to test the game engine :?

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:54 pm
by korexus
Correct, your current tribe is fixed, so the engine doesn't need to be told it. Just say you want to change tribes and you would like to be tribe 0007 (or whatever).


korexus.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:13 pm
by Aussie Gaz
Trewqh

Which part of your turn report?

I just had a look at your report and it looks fine.

Drop me a PM or email if you don't want to put details here.

Gaz

ps once I get the uppercase vs lowercase problem sorted there will be a rerun. Sorry guys.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:28 pm
by trewqh
If you want to rerun for my sake only, then let's not rerun, I'd rather go on.

TR:
Starting from my second attack till the very end of the TR excluding the parts that show what is in a province (after I took one and the status at the end of my TR) and the fighting/dicerolling part of attacks. The 'funny' parts are bigger and centered as if intepreted as some header autoformatting?

I'm using Opera 9.23, but I don't see how this could be the reason since neither the Standard WoK TRs or the TR from last turn in this game were ever displayed in this way.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:54 pm
by Aussie Gaz
Trewqh

Check your personal messages please.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:16 pm
by korexus
Aussie Gaz wrote: ps once I get the uppercase vs lowercase problem sorted there will be a rerun. Sorry guys.
I already fixed it, but at the entering orders stage. A rerun won't make any difference, but it won't happen in the future...


Chris.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:49 pm
by trewqh
Aussie Gaz wrote:Check your personal messages please.
I did and I didn't get any new messages from you.

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:15 pm
by Aussie Gaz
Turn 2 Marketplace (didn't print for some reason)

SLOT Amount #ID ITEMS, SPELLS & POTIONS PRICE(1) SELLER
===============================================
11 1 51 Corn 111 BigJOzzy
12 1 51 Corn 111 BigJOzzy
13 1 51 Corn 111 BigJOzzy
14 1 51 Corn 111 BigJOzzy
15 1 51 Corn 111 BigJOzzy
16 1 51 Corn 999 Brykovian
17 1 51 Corn 999 Brykovian
18 1 51 Corn 999 Brykovian
19 1 51 Corn 999 Brykovian
20 1 51 Corn 999 Brykovian
21 42 51 Corn 8 Trewqh
22 42 51 Corn 9 Trewqh
23 42 51 Corn 10 Trewqh
24 42 51 Corn 11 Trewqh
25 42 51 Corn 12 Trewqh
===============================================

Will try and fix this before next turn runs.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:34 am
by trewqh
Minor stuff:
In MINOR movements the saof says:
[xx] Number of units to move (01-30), OPTIONAL. IF OMITTED FULL 60 UNITS WILL BE MOVED.

Spycode cracking says:
Your guess is to high.
Your guess is to low.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:54 pm
by Aussie Gaz
trewqh wrote:Minor stuff:


Spycode cracking says:
Your guess is to high.
Your guess is to low.

I'll fix that tomorrow.


gaz




ps bloody polish english teachers. what would they know . (just kidding)

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:50 pm
by trewqh
Aussie Gaz wrote:ps bloody polish english teachers. what would they know . (just kidding)
Always ready to help! :lol:

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:29 pm
by korexus
trewqh wrote:Minor stuff:
In MINOR movements the saof says:
[xx] Number of units to move (01-30), OPTIONAL. IF OMITTED FULL 60 UNITS WILL BE MOVED.
I guess I'll fix that one then.

You know, I'm trying to write a script that will let you guys generate pictures of yourselves with all your cool stuff. You'd think I'd get a couple of days without all this other stuff being dropped on me! :roll:


Chris.

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:16 pm
by Aussie Gaz
Turn 3.

Guys - for whatever reason (probably my fault) turn 2 looks like it reran and then turns 3 and 4 ran.

I cannot undo the rerun of turn 2 (pretty sure Korexus cannot either).

If anyone was badly affected by this I apologise and hope you wish to keep playing.

If there are minor things that I can adjust before the next turn runs please send me an email and I will try to do that.

Gaz

ps I will extend the due date by 48 hours

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:08 pm
by korexus
A re-run can't be undone, short of repeated further reruns to try and get everything right. Not worth it in a normal game and certainly not worth it in a test run. It would be worth working out what went wrong so we can try to ensure it doesn't happen again, but that's about all we can do. I say, play on!


Chris.

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:25 pm
by trewqh
The rerun was better for me than the original run so I can't complain.

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:36 pm
by korexus
trewqh wrote:The rerun was better for me than the original run so I can't complain.
Re-run again! Re-run again!

:twisted:

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
by trewqh
I cant see any Troops or their Basic Level
Not really self-explanatory. I assume this means trying to learn about the Troops there failed not that there are no Troops that that could be seen. I'd suggest "I was unable to learn anything about Troops or their Basic Level".

Btw, is it possible to get info that there's 0 of each kind of Troops and still get the info that the LEV of those 0 Troops is 1.000?

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:29 pm
by Aussie Gaz
trewqh wrote:
I cant see any Troops or their Basic Level
Not really self-explanatory. I assume this means trying to learn about the Troops there failed not that there are no Troops that that could be seen. I'd suggest "I was unable to learn anything about Troops or their Basic Level".

Btw, is it possible to get info that there's 0 of each kind of Troops and still get the info that the LEV of those 0 Troops is 1.000?

The wording is as per the original wok5 and means exactly what it says. Your spy can't see any troops but it does not mean that there are none around.

Answer to your question is yes. :)

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:20 pm
by korexus
We should probably get everything as per WoK V first, then we can discuss how stuff could be changed to make it better. I agree that Al's wording was not always clear, but it'll do for now.

Side note: It's very hard to be sure that something isn't there (maybe you just can't see it because of the good-counter espionage). Would it be more fun if the failure and saw 0 results gave exactly the same feedback?


korexus.

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:52 am
by Aussie Gaz
Time to stir up some more debate about player in game scores.

Should a players EWOK score represent :

1 - His military strength

2- His economic/financial strength

or 3 - A combination of the above ?

Let the debate begin.

Gaz

ps leaving it up to me to decide is not an option :)