That got me curious, SF ... besides TK, how do you see it?SmashFace wrote:i dont' mean it for TKG but it seems as if ever since the champs started the scholars have been breaking apart.
-Bryk
That got me curious, SF ... besides TK, how do you see it?SmashFace wrote:i dont' mean it for TKG but it seems as if ever since the champs started the scholars have been breaking apart.
You do know the other Scholars read the boards as well TK, so it's not a smart thing to lie on the board.Thin_King wrote:Now, now. I said it was a POSSIBLE choice. However it is not a choice which I have made. We all know that. But lets not retrace old ground.Saladin wrote:You were the one who said a Scholar should do anything he can to win including nap breaking.
Well all i read on the boards is that there was never a nap established. And in the end this is a champs game, it's everybody for himself.Thin_King wrote:So you too would attack your own clanmate? Or at least you think it is OK? Would you promise not to attack and then still do it? If so you are lower than I thought.Saladin wrote:Now Raw has done nothing wrong and you complain.
The baby of the family then?Thin_King wrote:No, Wilfred, I am not. But nice try.Saladin wrote:BTW Craig are you an only child?
HmmmmmmRaw wrote:I want everyone to know that I don't break NAP's, never have and never will. TK, you can ask just about anyone in WOK, chances are they will agree that I did not break a NAP or agreement in this situation.
I wasn't talking about Roland's....Raw wrote:I tried to give you a half VP, but they wouldn't allow it at the time. Next time you'll know that you need to do work to earn the VP's though, not just sit and watch :p.
Actually, according to the clan rules, you can declare a clan with less than 4 members. You have 30 days to raise your membership count to 4. My guess is that no one would complain if it took you 60 days to find a 4th member. (Well, OK, some people would complain. Most of us would ignore them.)Lowebb wrote: Oh the reason I didnt act on the clan thing at that time was cause only me and underdog agreed to join. I now have Lardmaster in it so only need 1 more.
X-Wing
This is what I meant about the boards. Ben, are you just trying to start a flamer?Lowebb wrote:TK not only for the first time agree with Nick you're also beginning to sound like him "kaomaris corrupted", "not reading this thread anymore", "quitting kaomaris"
What ARE you talking about? Have you been drinking??Lowebb wrote:TK, you broke a NAP, not POSSIBLY broke it. I personally thought it was great you broke the NAP after all it was Nick, but you can't come out now with the high and mighty "scholars corrupt"