I didnt think a GM could award a 3-way split anyway. That would have to be a GMC decision. In which case of course the players might disagree...Dameon wrote:TK, you never filed a complaint with the GMC. In fact, we never officially made any decision here, except to advise Taker when he came to us. The simple fact is Taker couldn't award a 3-way split in light of the circumstances because the players did not agree to it. If Nesty and Massie did, then you'd have 1 VP right now- obviously they did not.
Actually this isnt about Taker at all. I think his conduct has been admirable. Its yours that I find fault with (now theres a shock ). It turns out that GH did not know about Strider being ejected under Taker's rules - something that you and I have talked about on the boards! For sure that would have an effect on which rules were in play at the time in question! But you decided not to mention it in GMC discussion? Or even to ask someone (Taker maybe) what really happened?Dameon wrote:In any case, no GM can award VPs without complete player agreement. Now, obviously you didn't agree with Taker's decision, which means you COULD file an official complaint with the GMC. If there are facts that Taker left out (which I find hard to believe) or was not aware of (possible) then we can review your case. However, do realize that unless these facts have some bearing on the implementation of the 8-city rule, they aren't likely to have an effect on what to this point has been our opinion/advice.
Cheaters never win, and, oh wait...
TK