Page 1 of 2

TO: Egbert

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 2:18 pm
by Duke
*drops a white glove with chokolatestains on the ground in front of Egbert*

- Full duel
- GM Han
- You pick the map

Duke turns around and limps away while laughing insanely

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:46 pm
by Egbert
Uhhh, how do you play "WOK: Duel"? :grey:

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:56 pm
by Tinker
Personally? Not too well... :lol:

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:54 pm
by Brykovian
Egbert wrote:Uhhh, how do you play "WOK: Duel"? :grey:
It's a 2-player game with each player playing 3 different colors. The remaining 4 colors are computer-controlled and follow a strict set of attack/convert/movement rules.

There's no diplomacy ... sheer military tactics.

I'm sure Han will fill you in with much more detail. :)

-Bryk

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:55 pm
by trewqh
Egbert wrote:Uhhh, how do you play "WOK: Duel"? :grey:
Check out the WoK Duel Rules in the menu on the left. That should clear things up.

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:56 pm
by Hannibal
Brykovian wrote:
Egbert wrote:Uhhh, how do you play "WOK: Duel"? :grey:
It's a 2-player game with each player playing 3 different colors. The remaining 4 colors are computer-controlled and follow a strict set of attack/convert/movement rules.

There's no diplomacy ... sheer military tactics.

I'm sure Han will fill you in with much more detail. :)

-Bryk
Yep, MUCH more detail! It's all in "WOK Duel Rules", in the menu top left of here. But Bryk's summary about sums it up.

Duke is a little bit brilliant at Duels. So beware, Eg, you stand very little chance against him in your first Duel ... (Just stoking up the sense of challenge! :wink: )

Han

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:31 am
by Egbert
(Egbert looks at the 50-page rule book) :shock:

Uh, this may take awhile Duke...................... :book:

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:55 am
by Duke
Duke:

Image

Egbert:

Image[/img]

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:06 am
by Hannibal
Egbert wrote:(Egbert looks at the 50-page rule book) :shock:

Uh, this may take awhile Duke...................... :book:
Where did you get 50 pages from?! :wink: It's one continuous page, but the Rules of Full Duel, printed out, run to 3 or 4 pages of printout.

Suggestions as to which bits to cut out? :wink:

If it's too complex for you, or you're using that as an excuse, feel free to stick to Standard!

H :wink:

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:42 am
by korexus
Egbert has the extreme big print version. :wink:


korexus.

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:42 pm
by Egbert
lol! Okay, it looks like everyone has had their fun. I finished reading the rules. It looks very interesting! I guess that's why it has been so popular these past few months. It even has a NAP-checking feature which I think would be great in a Standard WOK game. In Advanced WOK, 2 players can NAP and program the NAP into the game to extremely discourage NAP-breaking. Has anyone thought about doing this in Standard WOK, where 2 players would not be allowed to attack/bomb/spy each other because the computer won't let them.

Okay, Duke --- let's go! How about the Forest Lake map? :sniper:

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:28 pm
by Duke
Bring it!

Set it up Han

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:11 pm
by Hannibal
Right, I've set it up. Forest Lake map as Egbert suggested. Full Duel. Remember the AA, BB and CC temporary naps, as per rules, and that there is no headhunting for TWO turns, as per rules.

I think the set-up (only took me 5 tries!) looks even and interesting. But if either of you, looking at it for longer than I, reckons it significantly favours one side, then let me know, and I'll either run a fresh start or use bidding, your choice.

Sp pls lemme know: OK with you, or not fair and even?

Cheers,
GM Han

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:44 pm
by Duke
ok with me

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:25 pm
by Egbert
As I sometimes do in poker, I'll play the map without looking at it first. So, let's go!

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:35 pm
by korexus
Does that mean we can double any bets on you?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:15 pm
by Hannibal
Egbert wrote:As I sometimes do in poker, I'll play the map without looking at it first. So, let's go!
OK. From my POV, obviously i'd prefer you to take a look at the map and buy into it as fair. In case I missed something. It's a safety net for me. And so that neither will say later that they started with a poor hand, however prepared they were to risk it. That's why I requested that you take a look first?

Never mind. You are off. G'luck to both, and enjoy.

H :)

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 6:47 am
by Duke
He can look at maps all day long. Wont change the fact that he will have lost prior to turn 8. 8)

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:15 am
by korexus
Han, sometimes its fun to play from the weaker side. I guarantee you that Egbert won't complain about the setup after the game.

But then, as he's about to serve up Duke's rear end on a silver platter, he'd have to no cause to anyway... :twisted:


korexus.

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:19 pm
by Hannibal
korexus wrote:
But then, as he's about to serve up Duke's rear end on a silver platter, he'd have to no cause to anyway... :twisted:

korexus.
:D That sounds like a bet to me! OK, I accept your bet on Egbert. (TBH, I'd have taken an evens bet on EITHER player, if only to add to the fun and interest :wink: ). Let's call it one Sapphire? You just have to code up a way to pay me at the end - I already owe Bjorn a whole Pearl, which he's pressing for, but I can't see how to pay him; and I won and lost a Bar with two folks, too, on that Duke/Bryk Duel.

BTW, that's Sapphire with 2 p's. What is it with you Oxford graduates that you can't spell?! :wink: Oh, and, for consistency, you might grant pearl a capital P. You can pay me with an Emerald for this helpful advice :wink:

H