Page 5 of 7
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 12:00 pm
by trewqh
Strider wrote:We want a cage match!! Dance for us! DANCE!!!
Well, let's get back to...:
Me with korexus?! He wouldn't last 2 rounds with me. Just look at Al's 17.
trewqh
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 12:14 pm
by trewqh
gm_al wrote:You could have asked for a confirmation if I got your orders, this would have been good it seems. Ill do that from now on for non-AOF sent orders.
Could I propose updating the game's page with this info? I know that it is easier for me to update the page than send out e-mails after receiving each non-AOF sender orders. So how about that?
trewqh
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 2:16 pm
by gm_al
It is way easier to cick on 'Reply' and send a confirmation mail imho.
I do occasionally update the Group page between Turns, but not that often. Id rather look to see the KaoBase be in line. *hint, hint to other GMs*
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 5:39 pm
by Polymorphic
trewqh wrote:I didn't bring it up, I didn't expect you to bring this up, I don't want to talk about this so I won't comment that.
"Witness me saying nothing, absolutely nothing, I'm not saying anything am I?"
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 8:02 pm
by trewqh
Polymorphic wrote:trewqh wrote:I didn't bring it up, I didn't expect you to bring this up, I don't want to talk about this so I won't comment that.
"Witness me saying nothing, absolutely nothing, I'm not saying anything am I?"
Hmm... This could start a form/content discussion. But do we want this?....
... in this thread.
trewqh
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:45 am
by trewqh
Disciples of WOK defenitely need a rules page!
Griffon and Moridin!
I didn't expect such a behaviour from players who learned from Massielita and Dark Monk!
trewqh
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 10:13 am
by Saladin
Well what did they do then?
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 4:47 pm
by Moridin
Attack someone who no longer had a NAP with us?
He never extended it with us, I have the letter that clearly states when it was over if you want me to forward it to you Trewqh.
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 5:17 pm
by korexus
Carry on, children...
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 7:50 pm
by trewqh
Moridin wrote:Attack someone who no longer had a NAP with us?
He never extended it with us, I have the letter that clearly states when it was over if you want me to forward it to you Trewqh.
Please, do.
trewqh
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 pm
by griffon
trewqh wrote:Disciples of WOK defenitely need a rules page!
Griffon and Moridin!
I didn't expect such a behaviour from players who learned from Massielita and Dark Monk!
trewqh
Firstly, the business is between Donut and us. I am sure he can speak for himself. I don't want to go into details, but our nap expired. So it was open season. It is not our fault he is asleep.
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 12:00 am
by Donut
You're right, it is between you two and me. Heres the way I see it; You both spied me last turn. That I am almost certain of since both Warped and Polymorphic e-mailed me and assured me that they did not spy me. As neither of them would have any gain from spying me, I believe them. THIS is a "Breach of Contract" so to say. I admit that the attacks were in correspondence to our NAP as it ended AFTER last turn. I made a costly mistake in missing the turn. While it hurt me, I am far from out of the game; this I assure you.
Donut
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 10:47 am
by griffon
Donut wrote: THIS is a "Breach of Contract" so to say. I admit that the attacks were in correspondence to our NAP as it ended AFTER last turn. I made a costly mistake in missing the turn. While it hurt me, I am far from out of the game; this I assure you.
Donut
I am very sorry if that was the way you understood the situation. I was under the impression
it ended the beginning of the turn.
We were not breaking any agreements or contracts.
But I think there is a little bit of sour grapes involved on your part.
Again, I do apologise. I will make clearer naps in future.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:29 pm
by Saladin
Best thing to do is add a line saying, 'hostilities can begin on turn xx' that way there can't be any misunderstandings.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 7:45 pm
by Donut
This is the e-mail from YOU, to me:
Donut
Hi there, I am not sure about the terms of our (me and
Griffon) nap with you.
See if you agree with this:
5 turns started turn 2 ending turn 6? From turn 7 the
nap expires, unless we extend it of course.
Let me know,
Griffon
Now to me that means that the NAP ran Through 6?!?
Donut
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 7:53 am
by Warped Angel
"sniff sniff" you smell that? is something burning? OH YEAH BABY that would be Griffon LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm sorry but I have to say something about trewqhs avatar....uh... Well maybe I shouldnt say it.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 4:32 pm
by trewqh
Warped Angel wrote:"sniff sniff" you smell that? is something burning? OH YEAH BABY that would be Griffon LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm sorry but I have to say something about trewqhs avatar....uh... Well maybe I shouldnt say it.
Since my avatar is so inpiring then I would feel very bad if you suppressed your need to express yourself after being influenced by my image.
trewqh
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:00 pm
by Donut
I know I'm a newcomer to the game but from reading other posts it seems that diplomacy is a thing that many find very important to maintain a good reputation in. But... Judging my Griffon and Moridin's silence on the matter at hand, I don't get that feeling from them. It seems to me that they don't find their breaking of our NAP to be important enough to respond to my arguments. As I stated before in the Quoted e-mail, the NAP did not have "Questionable Terms" as Griffon stated that he misinterpreted the turn that it ended on.
I personally feel that the NAP we had between us had very concrete terms. I also feel that there premature spying should be compensated for. The provinces that were spied out were the first ones to be taken by Griffon. He knew enough to send 1 army into an undefended province with quite a few workers.
I'll leave it up to you 2 to come up with something; e-mail me when you have an answer. Until then, I don't think that I will be making any NAP's with either of you, or the DoW as I feel that they are poorly represented on this matter.
Donut
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2003 11:18 am
by griffon
Donut wrote:I know I'm a newcomer to the game but from reading other posts it seems that diplomacy is a thing that many find very important to maintain a good reputation in. But... Judging my Griffon and Moridin's silence on the matter at hand, I don't get that feeling from them. It seems to me that they don't find their breaking of our NAP to be important enough to respond to my arguments. As I stated before in the Quoted e-mail, the NAP did not have "Questionable Terms" as Griffon stated that he misinterpreted the turn that it ended on.
I personally feel that the NAP we had between us had very concrete terms. I also feel that there premature spying should be compensated for. The provinces that were spied out were the first ones to be taken by Griffon. He knew enough to send 1 army into an undefended province with quite a few workers.
I'll leave it up to you 2 to come up with something; e-mail me when you have an answer. Until then, I don't think that I will be making any NAP's with either of you, or the DoW as I feel that they are poorly represented on this matter.
Donut
Like I allready said, I'm sorry about the misunderstanding. I don't keep records of all the emails I send. The one you quoted is mine. So it is my mistake to do the spying. But that was all I did. I did not attack you beforehand.
As for compensation; the fact that you missed the turn sort of cancelled that out.
I also messed up my attack orders this turn, my armies would have been in nr 25 now.
Lastly, this is all a lot of noise about a small matter.
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2003 12:28 pm
by trewqh
A small matter you say?
So how about I spy on you one turn before our NAP ends? You OK with that?
trewqh