Page 1 of 4
VOTE #23
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:06 am
by Saladin
VOTE 23:
Should the WSC consist of:
1. All WOK players.
.
or
2. Continue with the current system meaning:
Code: Select all
"The WSC shall consist of one representative from every active clan, chosen by that clan, as well as one representative for every five long-standing members of the WOK Community. Also, Dark Monk has a permanent place on the WSC as the Creator of WOK.
Long-standing members shall be defined as a member who has at least 2 Years in WOK OR finished at least 20 games OR GMd at least 10 games. These members shall elect the proper number of representatives every year, and all clan heads will have the responsibility of appointing representatives from their clan AFTER the long-standing members have been determined. "
or
3. THE WSC will consists of:
Code: Select all
- Two representatives from every clan including the mercenaries.
- All active members of the development team.
- Plus the WSC has the right to nominate other players to join the WSC, which have to be accepted with a 2/3 vote though.
All players will have a chance to vote on this. The deadline for this vote is
Tuesday 3 July 2007 at 20:00 (GMT).
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:07 am
by Saladin
I vote for option 3.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:01 am
by Vortan
Of these - option 3
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:07 am
by Yondallus
option 2.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:54 am
by Calidus
Three
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:30 am
by Dragonette
option 3[/size] - would i be a member as i am doing the new score system. Which will take up my time and i will have to look around for the results if people dont tell me about them??
Dragonette
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:41 am
by TheDragon
Three
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:40 pm
by trewqh
Post moved
here not to clog the thread too much.
Everyone, please reconsider your decision to take part in this vote for as along as the fourth option is not added. (I explain in the linked post)
edited by trewqh
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:46 pm
by Aussie Gaz
Option 3
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:47 pm
by Vortan
Not am unreasonable democratic request - my vote is withdrawn until Trewqh has his 4th option for no WSC at this time.
Even if no-one votes 4 it still should be an option in fairness.
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:43 pm
by Saladin
The current vote tally is:
Option 1 = 0 votes
Option 2 = 1 vote
Option 3 = 5 votes
And one pregnant chad from Vortan.
Remember: All players will have a chance to vote on this. The deadline for this vote is
Tuesday 3 July 2007 at 20:00 (GMT).
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:55 pm
by Vortan
Oh stop your moaning you old woman - option 4 - there happy now?
And yes it HAS changed since you last looked.
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:08 pm
by korexus
What happened to the other suggestions? Or don't they fit into your grand scheme?
Chris.
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:38 pm
by Duke
I started to write something long here but realised that this wasnt the thread for it so here goes nothing:
I vote for option 2 (and dont call me a conservative old-timer)
I would like Raw and Hannibal as supreme commanders instead of the WSC. That way we would have profanity and adult language at arms length thanks to Raw and if we need something to read we would have endless of forumentries from Hannibal where he lets us in on the secrets of life.
(Now chill Han. You know I deep down has nothing but love for you.
)
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:03 pm
by Lord Fredo
Duke wrote:(and dont call me a conservative old-timer)
You conservative old-timer.
My vote is for 3
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:32 pm
by Duke
Aaah yes, a deciding body of a gazillion people. Lets all have some influence since it worked so well in Sovjet and Cuba
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 9:48 pm
by Lord Fredo
Well I really don't see the number of people being all that different between the two alternatives, it just seems like too much of a pain trying to figure out who is a long-standing member or not. In any case I am really not that bothered I just figured I'd use my right to vote.
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:06 pm
by Duke
...and that statement sums up 99% of all Swedish political voters
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:07 am
by Hannibal
I vote for option 4. No WSC till we're big enough to need one. It would just be divisive and bureaucratic. The WSC did nothing to halt WOK's decline down to 3 people active, but a handful of committed people did; and two of the four who "saved" WOK were NOT on the defunct WSC at the time. WSC would have let it die. It didn't work.
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 2:57 pm
by Hryllantre
I vote 4.
The other topic summed up my feelings on the matter...