VOTE #23

Saladin · Post by **Saladin** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:06 am

VOTE 23:

Should the WSC consist of:

1. All WOK players.

One player = One vote.

.

or

2. Continue with the current system meaning:

Code: Select all

"The WSC shall consist of one representative from every active clan, chosen by that clan, as well as one representative for every five long-standing members of the WOK Community. Also, Dark Monk has a permanent place on the WSC as the Creator of WOK. 

Long-standing members shall be defined as a member who has at least 2 Years in WOK OR finished at least 20 games OR GMd at least 10 games. These members shall elect the proper number of representatives every year, and all clan heads will have the responsibility of appointing representatives from their clan AFTER the long-standing members have been determined. "

or

3. THE WSC will consists of:

Code: Select all

- Two representatives from every clan including the mercenaries.

- All active members of the development team.

- Plus the WSC has the right to nominate other players to join the WSC, which have to be accepted with a 2/3 vote though.

This thread is only for voting! So you only have to put down option 1, 2 or 3!

All players will have a chance to vote on this. The deadline for this vote is Tuesday 3 July 2007 at 20:00 (GMT).

Saladin · Post by **Saladin** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:07 am

I vote for option 3.

Vortan · Post by **Vortan** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:01 am

Of these - option 3

Yondallus · Post by **Yondallus** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:07 am

option 2.

Calidus · Post by **Calidus** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:54 am

Three

Dragonette · Post by **Dragonette** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:30 am

option 3[/size] - would i be a member as i am doing the new score system. Which will take up my time and i will have to look around for the results if people dont tell me about them??

Dragonette

TheDragon · Post by **TheDragon** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:41 am

Three

Post by **trewqh** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:40 pm

Post moved here not to clog the thread too much.

Everyone, please reconsider your decision to take part in this vote for as along as the fourth option is not added. (I explain in the linked post)

edited by trewqh

Aussie Gaz · Post by **Aussie Gaz** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:46 pm

Option 3

Vortan · Post by **Vortan** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:47 pm

Not am unreasonable democratic request - my vote is withdrawn until Trewqh has his 4th option for no WSC at this time.

Even if no-one votes 4 it still should be an option in fairness.

Saladin · Post by **Saladin** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:43 pm

The current vote tally is:

Option 1 = 0 votes

Option 2 = 1 vote

Option 3 = 5 votes

And one pregnant chad from Vortan.

Remember: All players will have a chance to vote on this. The deadline for this vote is Tuesday 3 July 2007 at 20:00 (GMT).

Vortan · Post by **Vortan** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:55 pm

Oh stop your moaning you old woman - option 4 - there happy now?

And yes it HAS changed since you last looked.

Post by **korexus** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:08 pm

What happened to the other suggestions? Or don't they fit into your grand scheme?

Chris.

Post by **Duke** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 4:38 pm

I started to write something long here but realised that this wasnt the thread for it so here goes nothing:

I vote for option 2 (and dont call me a conservative old-timer)

I would like Raw and Hannibal as supreme commanders instead of the WSC. That way we would have profanity and adult language at arms length thanks to Raw and if we need something to read we would have endless of forumentries from Hannibal where he lets us in on the secrets of life.

(Now chill Han. You know I deep down has nothing but love for you.

)

Lord Fredo · Post by **Lord Fredo** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:03 pm

Duke wrote:(and dont call me a conservative old-timer)

You conservative old-timer.

My vote is for 3

Post by **Duke** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:32 pm

Aaah yes, a deciding body of a gazillion people. Lets all have some influence since it worked so well in Sovjet and Cuba

Lord Fredo · Post by **Lord Fredo** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 9:48 pm

Well I really don't see the number of people being all that different between the two alternatives, it just seems like too much of a pain trying to figure out who is a long-standing member or not. In any case I am really not that bothered I just figured I'd use my right to vote.

Post by **Duke** » Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:06 pm

...and that statement sums up 99% of all Swedish political voters

Post by **Hannibal** » Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:07 am

I vote for option 4. No WSC till we're big enough to need one. It would just be divisive and bureaucratic. The WSC did nothing to halt WOK's decline down to 3 people active, but a handful of committed people did; and two of the four who "saved" WOK were NOT on the defunct WSC at the time. WSC would have let it die. It didn't work.

Post by **Hryllantre** » Sun Jul 01, 2007 2:57 pm

I vote 4.

The other topic summed up my feelings on the matter...